a This is a problem ontology. Maalouf says, at the end of his theory of identity, a person who is always to question softly, "putting his hand on his shoulder," and always the same question: "Is it true what you say, but deep yque is what more do you feel?, ylibanes or French? ". This means that, andlor that is in the "fund" in "the depths of oneself" is a the pertenenciaa yExiste a single membership, unique, relevant and indivisible, which is what really matters? Perhaps these words may be a reflection of society a "or part of it, which shows that in the end, what is in each of us is that the" essence "of man, the" deep truth " of individuals is determined forever from birth and can not be modified. Concepts like his career, his beliefs, moral values, preferences, personal sensibility, his lifelong hobbies, may not have anything in the personal history of mankind. As we highlighted in the text, we have reviewed all the modules studied concepts from the ambiguity of the term culture that loses the idea of territoriality in favor of the idea multipertenencia social rather than geographical, adhering to the concept of culture-civilization. We also debate the particular cumulative, universal becomes a whole and what the public spends to enrich the Universal. The concept of cultural diversity resulting from the interrelation, contrast and contact between different cultures, where relativism is explained by power interests or the critique of ethnocentrism and their hierarchy in terms of inequalities and / or acculturation proposed do not always get Maalouf and as we continue to fight for their coexistence. We have also highlighted the functional sense of social actions increasingly relevant as the context and timing.
As a result of the claim end: not to raise the beliefs above the a verdada consistency, we have not spent more than tiptoe psychological categories and / or collective personality, which are associated with attitudes, behaviors and values own societies we territorial demarcation. We visited the idea of a otroa as a threat and as idealized, as leaders and foreign. And above all we have managed the terms of multiculturalism, criticizing the dominant criterion homogenization and undifferentiated individuals (loss of identity) with respect to globalization that now surrounds us. We talked about pluralism, which is rather a summation of cultures good and desirable, but which involves stratification and coexistence versus the idea of interaction that create a new society in part to the use of characters, property, depending on the particularities relevance of context. Neither the text speaks of multiculturalism associated with claims and ethical national minorities within a nation-state, of which the Spanish territory is a mosaic to study. And we have used fundamentalism as a belief, nationality, religion …, a to explain that they must be discarded, even though they are used to justify genocide and ethnocide. conciliatory end to accept it as a sense of culture to get a consensus on values, norms, and is subject to changes to balance power relations when they are altered. Psychologists vertices a "Cabinet of Madrid: C / Caleruega, 88A Cabinet Las Rozas de Madrid: 106 Lazarejo Ave Telephone: 91 631 44 93-690 75 85 35 – Email: e All rights reserved Licensed Psychologist Director of Vertices Master in Psychology Executive MBA in Psychodrama Bilingual in English and French Age 39 years of collegiate Nu M-22 453