We are not thinking in a mode of direct democracy. In the background, the representative variant has materialized the possibility of the dictatorship of the majority. Hence the urgent need to build spaces that deliberate and influence or determine policy decisions. That is, should be raised political subjects open to diversity and tolerance, with enough power acquired and derived from the deliberative practice. I have said that democracy is always a possibility in road where no freezes an institutional order and where the law is not a simple instrument of mineralization of the past. Policy, view as well, is not more than a continuous practice, an incessant transformation marked by new actors citizens decision-making. There is a hegemony, ignoring in this Instant old ideological factors, can refer to political parties, as monopolistic practices of representative democracy.

Shaping practices in the emerging social sectors that deliberate will occur sooner or later to let know that you ended at the end an abusive predominance. Element identification at all, which produces common sense will always appear. Incompleteness of every emerging industry will find joint, one which may be incidental to the exercise of a movement power, one that can be medium-range for purposes of slow chasing or even the birth of permanent bases on which continue to maintain diversity. To achieve this requires the creation of new subjective demands that join through a system of democratic equivalents. It is not alliances, but a process of modification of the identity of the acting forces. This requires no wrestling in terms that would adversely affect the direct interests of other possible forces to the joint and that remains the confrontation of various positions.

Ernesto Laclau, virtual father of the term radical democracy ensures that democracy is radical because each of the plurality of identities deesa terms is in itself the principle of its own validity, without this need to be sought on a positive basis that would establish the hierarchy or the meaning of them all, and which would be the source or guarantee of its legitimacy. Is true that facing the new world that appears before our eyes studying democracy and seek to innovate in it has become an essential task. The association between the emerging factors certainly criticise knowledge and prejudices, realise the unsustainability of the old paradigms and outgoing clarity will boost the exercise of decision-making. One of the features will be immediately putting on suspicion of arrogance of experts, also called party leaders. The citizen of the global world will not, therefore, a being isolated politically, because it will have furthered many of which deal with. The Association shall imply that each who becomes representative of himself. Passive citizens that we see in the 20th century democracy will come, by force, to its extinction. The political returns. The policy will cease as a privilege. The old complicity are breaking. The old foundations are sinking. Democracy will be intercultural in pluralistic societies. A confrontation so severe as that occurred between classical democracy and modern democracy is what configures the scenario. It now is between representative of the 20th century and the Industrial age democracy and democracy to which we don’t put adjectives but we simply call the 21st century.