With this attitude colocndo to the members of the organization in the skepticism within the intergroup conflicts is acquited of all individual and group responsibility, since they do not assume its capacity in the search of answers and resolution to other people’s conflicts own or, as as much interpersonal. In order to be able to confront the authoritarianism the culture of these would be necessary to have a shared vision of common values versus a. Therefore the group of this conscious type of organizations or unconsciously, In my opinion, it contributes that it follows the course of the conflict or aligning itself with the pursuers, or also in the insertion (probably by fear to that it happens the same to him) not avoiding therefore the cogoverning or preventive measures. Without hesitation Viktor Mayer-Schönberger explained all about the problem. This way the pursuer allows itself to settle down tasks without sense, changes of position, unwarranted critics, allocations of excessive amounts of work ; creating very low standards morals of the organization and a demotivation that causes these conflicting situations. The modern studies of the motivation and the leadership in the company show that these two factors influence in aspects keys: the effectiveness of the work in equipment, the integration and feeling of corporative property of the manager pictures, the assimilation of changes, complex innovations and situations, the real capacity and of growth and internationalization of a company, or the productivity and competitiveness of the same. A decision is of great quality if he is consequent with the objectives that the company tries to reach and with the information potentially available. PCRM brings even more insight to the discussion. A solution of great quality ” it solves problema” or it has great probabilities of obtaining it.
Tag Archive: the news
Incorrect examples: I need an assistant knowing to correct. = permanent action Bought a dog being lame. = permanent action We saw the girls taking a walk. = ambiguous 5.El gerund with function purely adjective ex: Women singing lowered of the source. The gerund with purely adjective function is incorrect; that is to say, the one that modifies to a noun. In previous oration, the gerund singing modifies to the noun women. When this happens, the gerund is equivalent to a pure adjective or a specifying adjective proposal (that sang). The used gerund of this form is incorrect, because this one must always own verbal and adverbial value.
In the following orations the verbal and adverbial value of the gerund can be seen clearly: Mopping plates, it explained the happened thing. Arriving at house, one remembered. This type of error is corrected replacing the gerund by an equivalent adjective proposal. Generally by " that + the verb in form personal". Examples: Women singing lowered of the source. that strong pains sang Several children suffering they arrived that day.
that they underwent the law raising the taxes is not joust. that it raises Exceptions: The gerunds can be used with purely adjective function burning and boiling: Several level ones burning were seen far. The boiling water pot was spilled to him. Also the gerunds in the work titles, pictures and feet of photographies can be used with adjective function: Caesar crossing the Rubicn. The frogs asking king. The director hoisting the flag. The gerund with adjective value, that is to say, the one that talks about a noun, must be a perception verb (verb in which it is appraised or perceives the action): to contemplate, to see, to watch, to observe, etc. Ex: It, contemplating the landscape, put itself to cry. Sometimes, besides having purely adjective function, the gerund expresses permanent action: She is a secretary speaking three languages. General observation: If the gerund correctly is used, it is possible to be replaced to him, generally, by a personal form of the verb preceded of " while, whereas, at the same time as, at the same time as, whereas, once, after " , etc. incorrect Gerunds: Corrections: I portrayed dog running in the garden. which ran Wrote a story narrating an impressive event. in which it narrates the car restrained, pausing several meters it advanced more. and one paused I was with farmers being poor. that they are Yesterday we saw your brother running in the park. which ran She is a secretary knowing to translate. that she knows discussed the problem, reaching an agreement. and It was arrived it gave to a trunk containing much clothes. that it contains We saw the lion leaving the mount. which left Men salomando walked towards the town. that they salomaban This is for the children living in the misery. that they live injured a truck being wounded three people. and they were Entered the room sitting down the first row. and one sat down the law raising the taxes is not right. that it raises We saw your brother taking a walk in the park. which took a walk They discussed three articles approving them at the end of the session. they approved and them are sold scholastic notebooks having beautiful drawings. that they have the small plane precipitated to earth dying all the passengers. and original Author and source of the article died.
And they do not create everything what they say to them. I advise to them not to mix metaphysics, with the esoterismo. Nothing has to do the one with the other. For my the esoterismo is but the ridiculous thing that exists, but science and metaphysics investigate causes. 9 2007 Jose Orlando Melo Naranjo The question that we approached in this treaty, falls on the relation that owns the theoretical physics and the philosophy. In the scientific philosophy we can approach the physics from several points of view.
The question is that we understand by physics? then, after several reflections a concept of the physics elaborates that seems to me advisable to take into account. In my opinion the physics is the result of the mathematical subordinate to the knowledge of the scientific causes open pies by the materialistic philosophy. Which represents an evident reality if the argument in its totality is analyzed. For our friend Aristotle the physics represents the science of a number of beings determined, which takes care of the substance that it owns in if the principle of movement and rest. In philosophy it is necessary to clarify the concepts that own some dark, with the purpose of to arrive at clear and evident truths that they form necessary foundations.
The Greeks of the antiquity made beautiful contribution to the societies, which we have analyzed through our philosophical investigation. We can suddenly listen to a reproach, in which he will say eloquently to us that very lightly we spoke advantageously of the Greeks of the antiquity. This opinion will be received with benevolence with the purpose of not to enter a too deep dispute and eloquent. But I am not first nor I complete in indicating the greatness of the Greek town. I consider advisable to listen men who treated better these matters and not like us we handled who them of an ignorant way. Carlos Luis de Secondat in the spirit of the laws says to us: 10 2007 Jose Orlando Melo Naranjo Anaximenes said that the principle is the infinite air. From which the things are generated acts to them, the past ones, and the future ones, the Gods and the divine things, and that the other things take place of that one. (DK 13 TO 7: Hiplito ref. 1, 7) In his Anaximenes cosmology it says that the Earth is flat and it rides on the air, of similar way to the sun. The igneous moon and the other stars ride in the air because also they are flat.
It does not have to fall aside and it must remain in the place to support the retorts of an earthquake. Reinforced beams and the joints also can help to prevent the deformity and collapse with buildings and structures during and after an earthquake. The Foundation the plates of foundation and the shock absorbers can be superposed so that the sliding movement and absorb the shock and the movement during an earthquake. These bases of plates must especially be designed so that they can help to limit the damages and to help to avoid the collapse of buildings and structures. Not to construct in soft ground the types of ground also can limit the damage brought about by an earthquake. Softer grounds contain a high amount of humidity and are more able to create more damage to the buildings and the structures that constructed on the more solid bases and their environs. To live in soft land, can amplify the movement of the earthquake.
This must to the fact that the energy passes through less dense material or substance, in this case, the ground. Proportion is the key Generally, never is advisable to construct buildings that are too high in comparison with their width. The width and the height of the building must be proportional unless special precautions are taken. The lack of Planning Some structures and buildings have been designed to fail in a planned form intentional. In the case of an earthquake, these faults have predicted this for protection of the nears space, where the occupants are probable that they are. These buildings and structures also are designed to diminish the amount of rubbish that can fall in the near buildings and their environs. The Buildings in the future the advances in the field of structural engineering are promising.
The advances in the field of structural engineering and the manufacture of construction equipments are becoming and are new construction equipments and superiors. The earthquake buildings on approval can be soon a reality. The investigation is being realised to the types of buildings and structures that would be able to resist earthquakes. Although we cannot control the natural disasters, at least we can do something to construct buildings safer than they protect the life of its occupants.
They are things in which we cannot be mistaken, no matter how hard good faith pushes to look for hopes after the faces, until we learn what is hidden between the teeth. , By all means nothing else healthful that to read between lines, like in intelligence work, being looked for the signal, the message, the true intentionality of that in the middle of the policy cannot express beyond the mooring cables of its position and commitment. Why what has been said? He is perhaps that we followed accusing the man of left of dreamy idiot poor man, padeciente of unreality (as Borges in one of its stories said), streamlining by flying theories, that the political game does not include and it goes letting go the opportunity to interpret the signals between frames of the speeches and gestures, forging uselessness to orient a political project? Probably. I am today speaking neither of Hugo Chavez nor of Barack Obama, first oriented towards the left and the second like the great screen of the imperial scheme where there are to look for signals to identify, figures (of step) of great political responsibility with respect to which it is easy to infer accusations. For the case, first it has given samples always to be under an alert status, slope of the political moved one and the wink of the eye of the opposite, denouncing it when the fraud has intuited, the double speech. Sample of it was the recent Summit of the Americas, to which Obama came to try confraternity speeches soon to be made the crazy person when returning to its house; in the occasion, the Venezuelan president was of first in denouncing it, yet and who as Chief of State has the diplomatic obstacle in his against. The second it seems exhausted already of as much slipping the bulk. He does not find how to conciliate the redeeming speech took that it to the presidency of the USA with the present practical position it forces that it to be one more a piece of the framework where very powerful families demean to the world-wide population..