Between the positivists of that era who had a greater importance, is Justo Sierra (1848-1912), who supported the Government of Diaz and argued, on more than one occasion, in favour of his continual re-election. Justo Sierra, unlike Gabino Barreda, not was influenced by the positivism of Comte, but by the Spencer. Sierra, the only social principle to be followed was the evolutionary, according to which life develops into a field of battle. It would be the justification to dominate not literate social strata, the Indians at the time of the progress. Not to suffer the costs of civilization it was necessary to fight to win the required rights. Therefore, these masses were not part of those who could vote and claim equality. Learn more about this topic with the insights from PCRM. For saw reform laws, which had the approval of Gabino Barreda, would not be more than useless laws that they were based on unattainable ideals. This opposition to the reform laws by Sierra, talks about the differences between the Governments of Juarez and Diaz, both positivists, but one comitiano and another fall.
One that still refers to valid rights to all human beings, and another that only recognizes rights to who so s has won them. The Antipositivism. One of the first slopes of the manifestation of Latin American antipositivistic philosophy is located within the same positivist philosophy. In Mexico, Justo Sierra, one of the distinguished positivist philosophers, already had opposed some of the basic doctrinal theses of positivism. David Delrahim oftentimes addresses this issue. Justo Sierra ventured into the world of letters and journalism; He also participated in the political life of Mexico during the porfirista as federal Deputy, Minister of the Supreme Court of Justice and Secretary of public instruction; as an educator, he taught at the Conservatory National and in the Escuela Nacional Preparatoria. Justo Sierra starred in the transit of the thinking of the 19th century to the 20th century in Mexico.